Dose-volume analysis of locoregional recurrences in head and neck IMRT, as determined by deformable registration: a prospective multi-institutional trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although IMRT for head and neck cancer is widely accepted, the implications of sparing normal tissue immediately adjacent to target volumes are not well known. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2002 and 2007, 124 patients with head and neck cancer were treated with surgery and postoperative IMRT (n=79) or definitive RT (n=45). Locoregional recurrences were analyzed for location relative to target volumes, and dosimetry. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 26.1months, a total of 16 locoregional recurrences were observed. The five-year actuarial locoregional disease-free survival was 82% [95% CI, 72-90%]. Analysis of 18 distinct sites of locoregional failure revealed that five of these failures were within the high dose clinical target volume (CTV), nine failures were at the margin of the CTV, and four recurrences were outside the CTV. The mean dose delivered to these recurrent volumes was 63.1 Gy [range: 57-68 Gy], while the mean dose to the coolest 1cc within each recurrence was 60.0 Gy [range: 51-67 Gy]. There were two periparotid recurrences observed. CONCLUSIONS: We observed excellent locoregional control rates overall. The majority of recurrences occur within high dose regions of the neck and not near the spared parotid glands.

Preservation of oral health-related quality of life and salivary flow rates after inverse-planned intensity- modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head-and-neck cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess whether comprehensive bilateral neck intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head-and-neck cancer results in preserving of oral health-related quality of life and sparing of salivary flow in the first year after therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-three patients with head-and-neck cancer (primary sites: nasopharynx [5], oral cavity [12], oropharynx [3], and all others [3]) were accrued to a Phase I-II trial. Inverse planning was carried out with the following treatment goals: at least 1 spared parotid gland (defined as the volume of parotid gland outside the planning target volume [PTV]) to receive a median dose of less than 20 Gy; spinal cord, maximum 45 Gy; PTV(1) to receive a median dose of 50 Gy; PTV(2) to receive a median dose of 60 Gy (postoperative setting, n = 15) or 66-70 Gy (definitive radiotherapy setting, n = 8). Treatment was delivered with 6 and 15 MV photons using a "step-and-shoot" technique on a Varian 2300 EX linac with 120-leaf Millenium MLC. Unstimulated and stimulated whole-mouth salivary flow rates were measured, and patients completed the University of Washington instrument (UWQOL) and a separate xerostomia questionnaire (XQOL) in follow-up. RESULTS: Early functional outcome end point data are available at the 1-, 3-, and 12-month follow-up time points for 22, 22, and 18 patients, respectively. The combined mean parotid dose was 30.0 Gy (95% confidence interval: 26.9-33.1). The differences from baseline in mean overall UWQOL scores at 1, 3, and 12 months postradiotherapy were -0.24, 0.32, and 4.28, not significantly different from zero (p = 0.89, p = 0.87, p = 0.13). None of the UWQOL individual domain scores related to oral health (pain, eating-chewing, eating-swallowing, and speech) at 1, 3, or 12 months were significantly different from baseline. Both unstimulated and stimulated whole-mouth flow was variably preserved. Unstimulated salivary flow at 1 and 12 months was inversely correlated with combined mean parotid dose (p = 0.014, p = 0.0007), whereas stimulated salivary flow rates at 3 and 12 months were also correlated with combined mean parotid dose (p = 0.025, p = 0.0016). Combined maximum parotid dose was correlated with unstimulated flow rate at 12 months (p = 0.02, r = -0.56) and stimulated flow rate at 1 and 12 months (p = 0.036, r = -0.45; p = 0.0042, r = -0.66). The proportion of patients reporting total XQOL scores of 0 or 1 (no or mild xerostomia) did not diminish significantly from baseline at 1, 3, or 12 months (p = 0.72, p = 0.51, p = 1.0). Unstimulated and stimulated flow at 1 month was inversely correlated with total XQOL score at 12 months (p = 0.025, p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Oral health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was highly preserved in the initial 12 months after IMRT, as assessed with separate, validated instruments for xerostomia-specific quality of life and oral HRQOL. In general, patients with better-preserved unstimulated salivary flow rates tended to report lower xerostomia scores. Whole-mouth salivary flow rates post IMRT were inversely correlated with combined mean parotid doses. Longer follow-up is required to assess to what extent HRQOL is favorably maintained.

An evaluation of forward and inverse radiotherapy planning using Helax-TMS (version 6.0) for lung cancer patients treated with RTOG 93-11 dose-escalation protocol.

This study investigated the dosimetric advantages of inversely planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) over forward-planned conventional 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in treating lung cancer patients at escalated dose. Three consecutively accrued patients on the RTOG 93-11 dose-escalation protocol were replanned using IMRT with the same dosimetric rules, so that the isodose distributions and dose-volume histograms could be generated and compared. The Helax-TMS treatment planning system, with an IMRT optimization module (version 6.0), was used. In all cases, a consistent approach of inverse planning and set of dose-volume constraints (DVCs) provided improved critical structure sparing. However, the minimum dose in PTV was generally below that achieved with the corresponding forward planned 3D-CRT.